A clear investigation record
Name the case, describe its purpose, and keep the address, network, snapshot, and recent activity together. Give the next reviewer enough context to begin.
GROUNDTRUTH / CASEWORK
Keep the evidence.
Keep the thinking with it.
Build a case another analyst can understand. Connect the original question, public observations, review notes, and evidence exports in a single investigation record.
REVIEW RECORD
Keep the chain of reasoning.
Source evidence → Analyst assessment → Next action
- Question
- What context supports this counterparty review?
- Network
- Ink / public address evidence
- Boundary
- Snapshot and recent indexed activity
One case recordJSON / CSV / MD
FROM OBSERVATION TO HANDOFF
01What did we observe?
02What do we infer?
03What happens next?
THE WORK, IN DETAIL
A focused set of tools.
A more useful investigation.
A strong case does more than preserve data. It preserves a line of reasoning.
Reasoning alongside evidence
Record competing hypotheses, the source references that support them, and the questions still open. Keep interpretation distinct from the data itself.
A deliberate review state
Keep active investigations open. Mark a case reviewed once you have documented the rationale and the follow-up that remains.
Exports for the next team
Use JSON for the structured record, CSV for transaction analysis, and Markdown for a readable brief. Choose the format that fits the recipient’s work.
THE INVESTIGATION METHOD
From the first question
to a considered next step.
- 01
Frame the case
State the decision being supported and identify the evidence inside the review boundary.
- 02
Write the assessment
Explain the observed relationships, the alternative explanations, and the unresolved gaps.
- 03
Prepare the handoff
Select a useful export, review its contents, and share it through your team’s approved channel.
THE NEXT STEP
Bring a real question to the evaluation.
Choose the workflow, sources, and outcomes that matter to your team.